Judge rules town can move forward, for now
March 13, 2003
By JAMES LEE
THE JOURNAL
February.
In Latin, the second month of the year is Februare, meaning "to
cleanse."
For the Romans, it was a month of purification and atonement.
For the Town of James Island, it was a month of waiting.
On Friday, the wait ended when Judge Thomas Hughston ruled that the
town can operate while appealing his ruling that legislation used to
create the town was unconstitutional.
Since his ruling on Feb. 7, the Town of James Island has been in legal
limbo - unable to meet or function, yet anxious to continue the town
business they started after their incorporation in May of last year.
"It is quite a mess, isn't it," James Island Mayor Mary Clark
said prior to Hughston's ruling last week.
The order issued by Hughston, according to town attorney Trent Kernodle,
allows the town to function without any restrictions or conditions.
"There are no restrictions in the order," he said. "We
consider that an earned victory."
The month of February also brought two developments that please town
supporters: a vow of support from S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster
and Jimmy Bailey's announcement of his candidacy for mayor of Charleston
in the November election.
McMaster recently announced that his office will support the town's
effort to appeal Hughston's ruling to the S.C Supreme Court.
He also stated that a deputy from his office is assigned to file briefs
in support of the town's appeal.
McMaster is following in the footsteps of former Attorney General Charhe
Condon, who also spoke out in support of the town.
While a representative from Condon's office addressed the court on behalf
of the town during the civil trial, Kernodle hopes that McMaster will
put himself more solidly behind the town.
Bailey, a former state representative and lifelong Charleston resident,
announced his candidacy for mayor and pledged to "talk with voters
from all sections of the city and the Town of James Island to see how
our common goals can be met."
In a December interview with The Journal, Bailey stated that if elected,
he would "ask City Council to drop the lawsuit and let those folks
that voted to become their own entity, and be governed by themselves
rather than by, as they think, a place that is as strange and as distant
as was England to the colonists several hundred years ago."
While Kernodle is hopeful that Bailey will live up to his statement,
the civil court decision and the pending appeal make a dismissal of
the lawsuit unlikely.
On Monday, legal council for the town filed the official appeal to the
Supreme Court, and according to Kernodle, several lengthy documents
have been completed to expedite the time until the Supreme Court.
"This will move a little bit quicker than normal," said Kernodle.
"The Supreme Court is likely to hear it in six to eight months,
and may rule on it that quick."
|